7 Best Improver Alternatives for B2B Enrichment in 2026
By Kushal Magar · June 15, 2026 · 13 min read
Key Takeaway
This guide compares seven Improver alternatives for B2B contact enrichment in 2026. Improver is a LinkedIn Chrome extension that extracts personal emails and phone numbers, with paid plans from $15–$80/year providing 50–500 credits/month — but its single-source model and low credit caps limit scale. SyncGTM is the top overall pick — waterfall enrichment across 50+ providers, 76+ data points per lead, AI workflow automation, and CRM sync starting at $89/mo. SignalHire offers a larger profile graph with a combined email+phone reveal. Apollo.io has the strongest free tier and built-in sequences. Hunter.io leads for domain-based email finding with deliverability confidence scoring. RocketReach is the closest paste-a-name replacement. Snov.io bundles finding, verification, and outreach in one affordable platform. Lusha wins on Chrome-extension simplicity at the lowest entry price.
Improver is a LinkedIn Chrome extension that finds personal emails and phone numbers from social profiles, with paid plans from $15 to $80 per year providing 50 to 500 monthly credits. For an individual prospector doing occasional LinkedIn lookups, that price point works. But most teams searching for Improver alternatives hit the same ceiling: 500 credits per month runs out fast, the single-source model misses contacts outside Improver's data coverage, and there is no automation, no CRM integration, and no sequencing built in.
The single-source limit is the deeper problem. Improver extracts what it can from its own dataset anchored to LinkedIn profiles. Move past consumer-facing LinkedIn data — into SMB founders, APAC operations leaders, or niche verticals — and hit rates drop. Paying per credit doesn't help when the contact simply isn't in Improver's database.
We evaluated seven Improver alternatives across data coverage, accuracy, pricing transparency, outreach integration, and fit for different team sizes. For more on contact enrichment tooling broadly, see our guide to the best B2B email finder tools and our deep dive on waterfall enrichment.
According to AlternativeTo, the most-recommended Improver alternatives include SignalHire, Hunter.io, and Snov.io. Reviewers praise Improver's low price and ease of use but consistently flag the low credit caps, limited data coverage outside LinkedIn, and the absence of any outreach or automation as reasons to switch.
TL;DR
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Free Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| SyncGTM | Waterfall enrichment + AI automation | $89/mo (annual) | Yes (free tier) |
| SignalHire | LinkedIn extension with broad profile graph | ~$69/mo (annual) | Yes (5 credits/mo) |
| Apollo.io | All-in-one prospecting + sequencing | $49/mo | Yes (150 email + 50 mobile credits/mo) |
| Hunter.io | Domain-based email finding with high deliverability | $34/mo | Yes (25 searches/mo) |
| RocketReach | Name or LinkedIn URL contact lookup | $39/mo | Trial only |
| Snov.io | Lead gen + multichannel outreach in one tool | $30/mo | Yes (50 credits/mo) |
| Lusha | Simple Chrome extension at lowest entry price | $22/mo (annual) | Yes (~70 credits/mo) |
Why Teams Look for Improver Alternatives

Improver.io — Chrome extension that extracts personal emails and phone numbers from LinkedIn profiles, starting at $15/year for 50 credits/month
Improver nails the LinkedIn lookup at the lowest possible price. But four structural limits push teams to look for Improver alternatives once prospecting scales beyond individual contributors.
- Low credit caps limit scale. Even the highest Improver plan gives 500 credits per month. A mid-size SDR team burning 50 leads per day blows past that in a week. There is no bulk enrichment tier — the model is built for individual reps, not teams.
- Single-source coverage gaps. Improver extracts data from its own LinkedIn-anchored dataset. Contacts in SMBs, APAC markets, or roles not well-represented on LinkedIn miss often. Waterfall enrichment platforms sequence through 50+ providers, lifting coverage from a typical 40–60% single-source hit rate to 80%+ on most ICPs.
- No automation or CRM sync. Improver stops at the reveal. There is no sequencing, no trigger-based enrichment, and no native CRM connector. Teams manually export CSVs and paste contacts into HubSpot or Salesforce — adding hours of ops work per week.
- Personal email focus can hurt deliverability. Improver surfaces personal Gmail and Yahoo addresses alongside work emails. Cold outreach to personal inboxes often lands in spam folders and risks compliance issues in GDPR-regulated regions.
For more on what a modern enrichment stack should look like, see our breakdown of the best waterfall contact providers and our roundups of SignalHire alternatives and Lusha alternatives.
1. SyncGTM

SyncGTM — waterfall enrichment across 50+ providers with 76+ data points per lead, AI agents, and native CRM sync
SyncGTM is a B2B enrichment platform best suited for outbound teams that need high coverage rates and automated pipeline workflows, offering waterfall enrichment across 50+ providers at $89/mo (annual) with a free tier.
Where Improver runs a single LinkedIn-anchored source and caps you at 500 credits per month, SyncGTM runs a waterfall — sequencing through provider after provider until a verified result lands, and only charging on success. That lifts contact coverage from the single-source 40–60% hit rate to 80%+ across most ICPs, eliminating the coverage wall that defines Improver's limit.
The data depth gap is significant. Improver returns personal emails and phone numbers from LinkedIn profiles. SyncGTM returns 76+ fields per record: verified business email, mobile direct dial, company firmographics, technographics, funding stage, headcount, LinkedIn URL, job title history, and buying signals like recent funding rounds, job postings, and technology installs.
SyncGTM's AI agents handle the workflow piece Improver omits entirely — triggering enrichment on CRM events, firing outreach sequences when buying signals match, and routing leads automatically to the right rep or sequence. That replaces the three-tool stack (Improver + CRM exporter + sequencer) most users maintain alongside their Improver subscription.
For a deeper look at coverage mechanics, see our best waterfall contact providers guide, or compare plans on our pricing page.
Pros
- Waterfall enrichment across 50+ providers
- 76+ data points per enriched record
- AI agents for workflow automation
- Native CRM sync (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Attio, Zoho)
- Buying signal triggers (funding, job postings, tech installs)
- Only charged on verified results — no wasted credits
- Credit rollover across billing periods
Cons
- No standalone Chrome extension for one-off LinkedIn reveals
- Higher entry price than Improver's $15/yr plan
- Steeper learning curve than a pure contact finder
Best for: Outbound teams building scalable pipelines who need high coverage, deep data, and automated workflows in one platform.
Pricing: Free tier · Starter $89/mo (annual) · Pro $224/mo (annual) · Business $584/mo (annual)
2. SignalHire

SignalHire — 400M+ social media profiles with combined email and phone reveal in one Chrome extension click
SignalHire is a contact finder best suited for recruiters and SDRs who need a LinkedIn Chrome extension with a larger profile graph than Improver, offering email and phone reveals from 400M+ profiles with an annual plan starting around $69/mo.
SignalHire is the most direct Chrome-extension upgrade from Improver. Both work inside LinkedIn profiles and return personal and business contact data in one click. SignalHire's key advantage is database size: 400M+ social media profiles worldwide versus Improver's narrower index, meaning fewer blank returns on the same search. SignalHire also combines email and phone in a single reveal where Improver sometimes requires separate credits.
The main tradeoff is price. SignalHire's annual plan runs significantly higher than Improver's $15–$80/year range. And like Improver, SignalHire runs a single database — there is no waterfall fallback when its data doesn't reach a contact. No native sequencing or CRM automation is included either.
For a full breakdown, see our SignalHire alternatives comparison.
Pros
- 400M+ profile database — much larger than Improver
- Combined email + phone reveal in one click
- Works across LinkedIn, GitHub, Twitter, and other networks
- Chrome extension with similar UX pattern to Improver
- Bulk enrichment for contact lists
Cons
- Much higher price than Improver (annual plan ~$69/mo vs $15–80/yr)
- Single database — no waterfall fallback on misses
- Only 5 free credits per month
- No native outreach or sequencing
Best for: Recruiters and SDRs who want a larger profile graph behind the same Chrome-extension LinkedIn workflow Improver uses.
Pricing: Free (5 credits/mo) · Annual plans from ~$69/mo depending on credit tier
3. Apollo.io

Apollo.io — 275M+ contact database with built-in email sequences, intent data, and a generous free tier
Apollo.io is an all-in-one sales intelligence platform best suited for SMB and mid-market outbound teams, offering a 275M+ contact database with built-in sequencing and intent data starting at $49/mo.
Apollo is the biggest jump from Improver in terms of capability. Where Improver extracts personal emails from LinkedIn profiles at up to 500 credits per month, Apollo offers 275M+ searchable contacts, 150 free email credits and 50 mobile credits per month, built-in email sequences, LinkedIn task steps, and buyer intent signals — all in one platform. If a team is manually exporting Improver CSVs into a sequencing tool, Apollo collapses that into a single workflow.
The tradeoff versus Improver is price per credit at low volume. Improver's $15/year plan works for a solo rep doing occasional outreach. Apollo's $49/mo Basic plan makes sense once a team is running consistent outbound volume. For any team of two or more SDRs with a real pipeline motion, Apollo outperforms Improver on every meaningful metric.
For a fuller breakdown, see our Apollo.io review.
Pros
- 275M+ contact database — vastly larger than Improver
- 150 email + 50 mobile credits/mo on free tier
- Built-in email sequences and LinkedIn task steps
- Buyer intent data on paid plans
- Strong CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce)
Cons
- Per-seat pricing climbs with team size
- Phone credits cost more than email credits
- Advanced features locked to higher plans
- Single-source data — no waterfall fallback
Best for: Teams wanting prospecting, enrichment, and sequencing in one platform with the strongest free tier on this list.
Pricing: Free · Basic $49/mo · Professional $79/mo · Organization $119/mo (all annual billing)
4. Hunter.io

Hunter.io — domain search and email verification with confidence scoring and built-in email campaigns
Hunter.io is a domain-based email finder best suited for teams prospecting by company name rather than LinkedIn profile, offering email discovery with confidence scoring and built-in campaign features starting at $34/mo.
Hunter takes a fundamentally different approach from Improver. Where Improver starts with a LinkedIn profile and extracts personal contact data, Hunter starts with a company domain and surfaces work emails using pattern detection, public web sources, and a large email index. Hunter's domain search returns all known email addresses associated with a domain — useful for accounts where you know the company but not the specific contact.
Hunter's confidence scoring is a meaningful differentiator. Every email gets a percentage score indicating deliverability likelihood — so teams can filter for high-confidence sends and avoid bounces that damage domain reputation. Improver returns addresses without verification confidence data. Hunter also includes built-in email campaigns and a basic CRM, adding outreach capability Improver doesn't have.
For more context, see our Hunter.io alternatives roundup.
Pros
- Domain search surfaces all contacts at a company
- Confidence scoring on every email for deliverability
- 25 free domain searches and 50 verifications/mo
- Built-in email campaigns with replies-from-Gmail/Outlook
- GDPR-compliant data sourcing
Cons
- Domain-first approach misses contacts not indexed per domain
- No phone number enrichment
- No firmographic or technographic data beyond contact
- No waterfall fallback — single-source model
Best for: Teams who prospect by company first and need verified work emails with deliverability confidence scoring.
Pricing: Free (25 searches/mo) · Starter $34/mo · Growth $104/mo · Business $349/mo (annual billing)
5. RocketReach

RocketReach — 700M+ profile graph with paste-a-name workflow, browser extension, and bulk lookup
RocketReach is a contact-lookup platform best suited for reps who want to look up contacts by name or LinkedIn URL against a much larger database than Improver, offering 700M+ profiles with email and phone reveals from $39/mo.
RocketReach is the closest workflow match to Improver at larger scale. Both accept a name or LinkedIn URL and return contact data. RocketReach's advantage is raw database size: 700M+ profiles versus Improver's narrower index, which means significantly fewer empty returns on the same contact searches. The browser extension works on LinkedIn profiles in the same single-click pattern Improver users are familiar with.
The tradeoffs are limited firmographic depth and no native sequencing. RocketReach returns email and phone data reliably, but company-level intelligence (tech stack, funding, headcount growth) is thin compared to a full sales intelligence platform. And like Improver, there is no waterfall — when RocketReach's graph doesn't reach a contact, the search ends empty.
For a side-by-side, see our RocketReach alternatives roundup.
Pros
- 700M+ profiles — 1.75x larger than SignalHire, far beyond Improver
- Paste-a-name or LinkedIn URL workflow similar to Improver
- Email and phone in one reveal
- Browser extension and bulk lookup
- $39/mo entry is competitive for the database size
Cons
- Single graph — no waterfall fallback on misses
- Thin firmographics, no buying signals
- No native outreach or sequencing
- No usable free tier (trial only)
Best for:Reps who want Improver's name/URL lookup motion but need a database that covers far more contacts.
Pricing: Essentials $39/mo · Pro $99/mo · Ultimate $249/mo (annual billing)
6. Snov.io

Snov.io — lead generation platform combining email finding, verification, drip campaigns, and LinkedIn automation
Snov.io is a multichannel lead generation platform best suited for small teams that want email finding, verification, drip campaigns, and LinkedIn automation in one affordable subscription, starting at $30/mo.
Snov.io is the most complete bundle on this list at a price point close to Improver. Where Improver is purely a contact extractor, Snov.io combines a domain email finder, a LinkedIn Chrome extension, email verification, drip email campaigns with personalisation, and LinkedIn automation into one platform. Integration with 5,000+ third-party tools via native connectors and Zapier handles the CRM push that Improver users do manually.
The tradeoff is database depth. Snov.io's contact graph is smaller than Apollo or RocketReach, and phone number coverage is thinner than dedicated dialers. For teams where email outreach is the primary motion and budget is tight, Snov.io's bundled approach offers far more than Improver at a comparable total cost.
For a full comparison, see our Snov.io alternatives roundup.
Pros
- Email finder + verifier + drip campaigns in one tool
- LinkedIn Chrome extension similar to Improver
- 50 free credits per month with no credit card
- 5,000+ integrations via native connectors and Zapier
- LinkedIn automation for multi-touch sequences
Cons
- Smaller contact database than Apollo or RocketReach
- Lighter phone number coverage than dedicated dialers
- No waterfall enrichment across multiple providers
- Advanced LinkedIn automation can risk account flags
Best for: Small B2B teams that want email finding, verification, and outreach bundled affordably — with more capability than Improver at a similar price tier.
Pricing: Free (50 credits/mo) · Starter $30/mo · Pro $75/mo · Managed Service custom (annual billing)
7. Lusha

Lusha — lightweight LinkedIn Chrome extension focused on direct-dial and work email lookups with a generous free tier
Lusha is a contact-lookup tool best suited for reps who want the simplest possible LinkedIn Chrome extension with a usable free tier, offering paid plans from $22/mo (annual) and ~70 free credits per month.
Lusha is the Improver alternative that feels most familiar in use. Both are Chrome extensions that surface contact data on LinkedIn profiles in one click — same motion, same speed, same simplicity. Lusha's advantages over Improver are a larger database, stronger North American direct-dial coverage, a more generous free tier (~70 credits vs Improver's 3), and a GDPR compliance framework that makes work emails safer for cold outreach than Improver's personal-email focus.
The limits mirror Improver's. Lusha runs a single source with no waterfall fallback, coverage thins outside North America, firmographics are light, and there is no native outreach or sequencing. For teams that want Improver's exact simplicity with more credits and better compliance, Lusha is the natural next step.
For more context on Chrome-extension contact tools, see our Lusha alternatives comparison.
Pros
- ~70 free credits/mo — dramatically more than Improver's 3
- Same single-click LinkedIn extension simplicity
- Strong North American direct-dial coverage
- Work email focus reduces compliance risk vs Improver
- Lowest-priced paid Improver alternative at ~$22/mo (annual)
Cons
- Single source — no waterfall fallback
- Coverage thins outside North America
- Light firmographics, no buying signals
- No native outreach or sequencing
Best for:Reps who want Improver's exact Chrome-extension simplicity with more credits, better compliance, and a larger database — at the lowest possible paid price.
Pricing: Free (~70 credits/mo) · Pro $22/mo (annual) · Premium $44/mo (annual) · Scale custom
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Tool | Best For | Standout | Starting Price | Free Tier | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SyncGTM | Waterfall enrichment + AI automation | 50+ providers in waterfall, 76+ data points, AI agents, CRM sync | $89/mo (annual) | Yes (free tier) | 4.8 |
| SignalHire | LinkedIn extension with broad profile graph | 400M+ profiles, combined email + phone reveal, extension | ~$69/mo (annual) | Yes (5 credits/mo) | 4.5 |
| Apollo.io | All-in-one prospecting + sequencing | 275M+ contacts, built-in sequences, intent data | $49/mo | Yes (150 email + 50 mobile credits/mo) | 4.8 |
| Hunter.io | Domain-based email finding with high deliverability | Domain search, confidence scoring, built-in email campaigns | $34/mo | Yes (25 searches/mo) | 4.4 |
| RocketReach | Name or LinkedIn URL contact lookup | 700M+ profiles, paste-a-name workflow, browser extension | $39/mo | Trial only | 4.5 |
| Snov.io | Lead gen + multichannel outreach in one tool | Email finder, verifier, drip campaigns, LinkedIn automation | $30/mo | Yes (50 credits/mo) | 4.5 |
| Lusha | Simple Chrome extension at lowest entry price | Fast LinkedIn extension, direct-dial focus, quick onboarding | $22/mo (annual) | Yes (~70 credits/mo) | 4.3 |
How to Choose the Right Improver Alternative
The right Improver alternative depends on your team size, outreach motion, and how much you need beyond basic contact extraction. Seven quick decision rules:
- Need highest coverage and full automation? Pick SyncGTM — waterfall enrichment across 50+ providers, 76+ data points, and AI workflows with native CRM sync.
- Want the same Chrome-extension motion with a bigger database? SignalHire has 400M+ profiles and the same one-click LinkedIn reveal pattern.
- Need prospecting + sequencing in one tool? Apollo.io bundles 275M+ contacts with built-in email sequences and the strongest free tier on this list.
- Prospecting by company domain rather than profile? Hunter.io finds all emails at a domain with deliverability confidence scoring.
- Like Improver's paste-a-name motion at scale? RocketReach offers the same workflow against a 700M+ profile graph.
- Need finding + verification + outreach in one affordable bundle? Snov.io packs all three into a platform close to Improver's price range.
- Want Improver's simplicity with more credits and better compliance? Lusha gives ~70 free credits/mo and work-email focus at the lowest paid price.
Final Verdict
Improver is a useful entry-level LinkedIn contact extractor at an extremely low price — but its 500-credit monthly cap, single-source coverage model, and absence of automation make it a solo-rep tool that doesn't scale with a real outbound team.
For the best balance of coverage, data depth, and automation, SyncGTM is the top Improver alternative in 2026. Waterfall enrichment across 50+ providers lifts coverage to 80%+, returns 76+ data points per lead including buying signals, and only charges on verified results — with native CRM sync and AI automation under one subscription.
If you want a like-for-like Chrome-extension upgrade, SignalHire or Lusha match Improver's motion with larger databases. Apollo.io is the strongest all-in-one pick with the best free tier. Snov.io is the most complete bundle near Improver's price point. And Hunter.io wins for domain-first email finding with deliverability confidence. Compare plans on our pricing page to see where SyncGTM lands for your team size and volume.
